[Asterisk-Users] Re: Polycom vs. Cisco IP Phones
Noah Miller
noah at rosecompanies.com
Thu Mar 17 11:13:14 MST 2005
> Not sure the rquirements for your receptionist. I have found that the
> IP600 does have most everything required to function properly. If you
> do have an office without DID and a lot of traffic then you may want to
> look at the tools to display status on her computer. I do have a Snom
> inhouse for testing when I get a chance. Their quality however is not
> as good as either Cisco or Polycom.
My experience is that the Cisco and Polycom phones are both about in
terms audio quality and useability. Neither one does exactly what I'd
expect with respect to multiple lines. They both take a little extra
setup in this regard, but you can read the wiki for that stuff. Snoms
do exactly what I'd expect for a multiple line phone, are very easy to
setup, but the audio quality and usability do not compare favorably
with either Cisco or Polycom.
Between Cisco and Polycom, I went with Polycom just because of cost.
The Polycom units are MUCH less expensive (since this is not the biz
list, ask me privately about my reseller that is cheaper than others
you'll find). On the other hand, Polycom VoIP phones are NOT supported
by the company. The only way I've gotten support for them is from this
list. Cisco definitely supports all their products quite nicely (for a
fee).
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list