[Asterisk-Users] Survey: what's the best HTTPd/TFTPd/FTPd to
serve up configuration files to sets
Kristian Kielhofner
kris at krisk.org
Sat Mar 5 23:05:03 MST 2005
Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
> I would like to start a discussion centred around the various ways one
> might serve up configuration files from an Asterisk server (I know, it's
> better to use a secondary server for all this, but let's talk about a
> smaller system).
>
> The types of things being served would include:
> - Logo image for sets that support that
> - XML directory files
> - XML or raw text configuration files
> - what-all-else
>
> Seems to me that Apache is simply way too overpowered for all this, and
> thus would needlessly place load on the server.
>
> I have heard that khttpd is pretty lightweight, but its use seems to
> have been deprecated, and it does not appear to be actively maintained.
> Is TuX the way to go?
>
> As for tftpd and ftpd, I'm just not sure. Leightweight is the key, here.
>
> Thoughts, opinions, experiences?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jim.
>
>
> --
> Jim Van Meggelen
> jim at vanmeggelen.ca
>
Jim,
My vote for small:
HTTP: mini_httpd (or thttpd)
FTP: vsftpd
TFTP: tftp-hpa (hands down, no questions asked the best TFTP server.
Anyone who has ever used PXE can back me up on this one.)
Features:
HTTP: Apache (duh!)
FTP: proftpd
TFTP: tftp-hpa
My $0.02.
--
Kristian Kielhofner
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list