[Asterisk-Users] X100P
connectedas extensionto Panasonic616EASA-PHONE
Terry H. Gilsenan
thg at interoil.com
Thu Jun 30 19:53:31 MST 2005
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of
> John Novack
> Sent: Friday, 1 July 2005 12:53 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P connectedas extensionto
> Panasonic616EASA-PHONE
>
> Terry H. Gilsenan wrote:
> <snip>
>
> >
> >Oh, and diplomacy does indeed have better results than rudeness (in
> >most cases anyhow), but perhaps I am the exception?
> >
> >T
> >
> >
>
> Sorry, but I was following the lead of quite a few others on
> this list, who consider rude the rule.
> Check the archives for the last month and you will see.
> Sorry to have fallen into the same trap as too many others.
Ok, kewl.
> As to this not being the Panasonic list, true enough, but
> those unfamiliar with a specific item other than asterisk
> generally don't comment on items the aren't familiar with.
Ah yes, however if you look at me response it seems that I misunderstood the
question and didn't realise the relevence of the particular bit of kit.
> And this list seems to not only cover Asterisk, but Cisco,
> Polycom, Snom, firewalls, routers and just about everything
> else that could possibly connected to Asterisk, and some that
> can't, though the list police can be quick to yell that AAH,
> AMP and such addons don't belong here.
>
Yes, I have see the indifference shown by said list police towards the
various stuph, and at the same time I have noted the antipathy shown by same
to AAH. Its quite sad really. Sauce for the goose and all that, wot?
> Enjoy
>
Oh I do, I do! Fast, LOUD, and often....
T
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list