[Asterisk-Users] Re: Re: Digium Website Update: Asterisk Business
Edition
Andrew Kohlsmith
akohlsmith-asterisk at benshaw.com
Sun Jun 12 16:23:29 MST 2005
On Sunday 12 June 2005 04:14, trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote:
> Really. So if I use a non GPL libc I cant run asterisk? Interesting
> that its so parasitic that you will either be assimilated or not. I
> however dont think that is the case. Modules, yes they are considered
> derritave works (my opinion is that they arent but that is the wording
> on gnu.org), libraries can go either way. There are ways to curtail
> this behaviour if desired and make it so you can only link against GPL
> code, but then things like the manager interface cant be controlled that
> way. If that were the case they could say you cna only use GPL sip
> clients and they cant (and specifically dont) say that.
It was just mumbings and I do believe that they were resolved in a "common
sense" fashion. i.e. .so's are linked, whereas AGIs and Manager interfaces
are not. I have not, however, seen anything *definitive* on it.
-A.
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list