[Asterisk-Users] Digium G729 licensing - is it worth the trouble?
Gavin Hamill
gdh at laterooms.com
Mon Jun 6 01:45:57 MST 2005
Yeh, I know what you mean re segfaults.. I just worked through the directory until I found one that worked and had good translation times (9ms on a P4-celeron)..
"show translation recalc 10" is the magic command.
The codec works fine with the ATCOM -320 phones - in a test environment it worked fine with a few UK providers.
gdh
-----Original Message-----
>From: "Nir Simionovich"<nirs at dimitel.com>
>Sent: 06/06/05 09:26:32
>To: "'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'"<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
>Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Digium G729 licensing - is it worth the trouble?
>
>>>Cool, so you have satisfied yourself that you are licensed to use the
>>>G.729 codec and not get your ass sued by the IP holders. Now you can
>>>simply use the no-license-required codecs from here...
>>>
>>>http://kvin.lv/pub/Linux/Asterisk/
>
>I've tried using these codecs in the past, but usually ended up with a pile
>of
>SegFaults and Machine Halts. Question is, are these codecs maintained by
>Someone, and if they had ever been interoped with other equipment. It's one
>Thing to implement a codec, there is another interoping it with other
>vendors.
>
>Nir S
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list