[Asterisk-Users] super high bandwidth codec

[Michael Graves]

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:50:11 -0700, Andrew C. Brown wrote:

>Brian Capouch wrote:
>> Geoff Manning wrote:
>> 
>>>>>> Skype uses wideband-ilbc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't think thats right. I think it just uses iLBC over it's own
>>> proprietary Voip protocol.
>>> http://www.skype.com/help/faq/technical.html
>>> How much bandwidth does Skype use while I'm in a call?
>>>     Skype automatically selects the best codec depending on the
>>> connection
>>> between yourself and the person you are calling. On average, Skype uses
>>> between 3-16 kilobytes/sec depending on bandwidth available for other
>>> party,
>>> network conditions in between, callers CPU performance, etc.
>> 
>> 
>> I don't think that's correct.
>> 
>> I don't have the link to the Columbia paper where they tried (with only
>> mixed success) to figure out what all nefarious stuff Skype does
>> (hijacking port 80 being the most pernicious) but I'm pretty sure they
>> have figured out that if possible, it will use the (proprietary)
>> wideband version of iLBC.
>> 
>
>FYI: One can find the columbia paper link by going to the VoIP wiki's
>Skype page.
>
>According to GIPS datasheets, GIPS offers two proprietary wideband
>codecs. iPCM-wb and iSAC. Both have 16kHZ sample rate* which is double
>the 8kHz of PSTN, iLBC and most of the other codecs, hence the
>relatively wonderous sound quality which I, among others, covet for
>Asterisk.
>
>The channel bit rate is respectively (it varies dynamically)
>iLBC (free)	13-15kbps
>iSAC ($)	10-30kbps
>iPCM-wb ($)	80kbps
>
>iPCM-wb doesn't seem to offer any outright fidelity advantage over iSAC
>since they are the same sample rate. I presume all those extra bits are
>redundancy to make the quality more robust.
>
>* Ref: http://www.globalipsound.com/solutions/solutions_Codecs.php
>

A recent blog entry indicated that GIPS was issuing licenses for its
technology from a mere $50k for "unlimited licenses" with respect to an
agreement with Microsoft. I don't have a huge concern about bandwidth
limits. If I could get better quality than G.711 in the same bandwidhth
that would be great.

However, since I'm using IAX2 based DIDs and termination would it
really matter? That is, if the ITSPs are connection to the PSTN via TDM
interconnects wouldn't any calls be limited to G.711 quality anyway?

Michael

--
Michael Graves                           mgraves at pixelpower.com
Sr. Product Specialist                          www.pixelpower.com
Pixel Power Inc.                                 mgraves at mstvp.com

o713-861-4005
o800-905-6412
c713-201-1262