[Asterisk-Users] ATXFER discussion, what's your opinion ?
Patrick Friedel
pfriedel at copweb.com
Wed Jul 20 14:15:49 MST 2005
afoc at interconnessioni.it wrote:
>>>That's exactly my opinion: isn't ironic that the only function "joe
>>>sixpack" will use in a pbx is the worst implemented ?
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>Maybe because most asterisk PBX's are implemented using business class
>>softphones rather than analogue phones? Most business class SIP phones
>>(and even grandstream phones) allow attended/non-attended transfers with
>>asterisk-stable and/or asterisk-head...
>>
>>
>
>I think that's mostly right, but it should also be a "native" xfer function working the same way regarding of the user agent, some sort of common ground we can "trust" for installation with mixed devices.
>
>By the way: anyone got experience in attended trasfer with snom ? :)
>
>Alessio Focardi
>
>
Oh, you mean the completely natural feeling "put them on hold, dial
new party, tell them you have a transfer, hit transfer"? I want some of
whatever kool-aid the person who thought that one up had. I still feel
like I'm losing a call every time I do an attended transfer.
Is there a _technical_ (e.g. SIP) limitation on this?
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list