[Asterisk-Users] Single or Dual Processor? High volume MeetMe

[Geoff Nordli]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-
> bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of William Boehlke
> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 2:20 PM
> To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Single or Dual Processor? High volume MeetMe
> 
> On Intel it is our experience that the constraint is the PC bus.
> Throughput
> tops out at somewhere between 50 and 100 calls depending on disk speed,
> without ever using a meaningful part of one processor.
> 
> William Boehlke
> Signate
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Spencer
> Nassar
> Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 11:21 AM
> To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Single or Dual Processor? High volume MeetMe
> 
> 
> Has anyone benchmarked Asterisk on a dedicated single versus dual
> processor machine?  Or could any Asterisk developers comment on whether
> it is architected in such a way that threads could run on multiple CPUs
> (especially MeetMe2)?
> 
> At a higher level, can I host more simultaneous lines and/or
> conferences for MeetMe if I use a dual processor machine versus single?
>   Also, any info on memory use with high numbers of conference users
> (100, 1000)?
> 
> Thanks!
> 

Has anyone done any testing with the Apple X Serve G5
(http://www.apple.com/ca/xserve/) or Sun
(http://www.sun.com/servers/entry/v20z/index.jsp) Sun Fire machines?

I would think that something like the Apple could handle the IO a lot
better.

Geoff