[Asterisk-Users] Re: Interesting bellster issue

[Ed Guy]

>.... However, the second route tried by bellster ended up with
>"This is 9:25 local time, calls are only permitted from ... to
>...". It means that the remote asterisk accepted the call to play the
>message, instead of using Congestion to use another route or fail. I
>"lost" one credit without having the call placed, but what is more

The owner of this node has fixed the problem.

/ed


-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of Samuel
Tardieu
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 3:30 AM
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Interesting bellster issue


>>>>> "dhh" == dhickman  <dhickman at its-my.net> writes:

dhh> When I make a call, bellster anounces that I have no credits and
dhh> says goodbye, but it still routes the call.

I just noticed another interesting problem: I checked that using
Congestion I can appropriately reject an incoming bellster call and
that another route is used (on extension +331, France,
Paris). However, the second route tried by bellster ended up with
"This is 9:25 local time, calls are only permitted from ... to
...". It means that the remote asterisk accepted the call to play the
message, instead of using Congestion to use another route or fail. I
"lost" one credit without having the call placed, but what is more
important is that no other route has been tried, and that my PBX
thinks that the call succeedeed and will not try an alternative route
such a Zap line.

The problematic route is 179.

  Sam
-- 
Samuel Tardieu -- sam at rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/sam

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users