[Asterisk-Users] G.729? Worth it?
Jim Van Meggelen
jim at vanmeggelen.ca
Wed Jan 19 11:32:04 MST 2005
asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com wrote:
>> Low bandwidth
>> Low CPU utilization
>> Best audio quality
>>
>
> I think you might want to clarify that Best audio quality is in
> relation to other highly compressed codecs. Certainly my (albeit
> limited) experience is that g711 is much more clear than g729.
> Compared against gsm, for example, however, the audio quality is
> quite good....
What I was saying was that you can only have two of the three. It's an
old adage about compromise.
G.711:
Low Nadwidth: NO
Low CPU utilization: YES
Best Quality: YES (as far as telephony codecs go)
G.729
Low Bandwidth: YES
Low CPU Utilization: NO
Best Quality: NO
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.0 - Release Date: 17/01/2005
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list