[Asterisk-Users] Operator Panels?

[Matt Schulte]

Ok, I think I somewhat understand the concept now that I think about it.
You only want to xfer your trunks correct? In other words Zaptel to
user. We also have IAX trunks for outbound that support multiple lines.
Creating one instance the the IAX trunk won't work because it can only
show one call. I was thinking a solution may be to create an instance
for several trunks ie:

IAX2/blah/1
IAX2/blah/2
.. so forth

The problem with that is 1) the trunk numbers can be random, or at least
"stack" and eventually reset back down to one? I couldn't find a way to
force these range of numbers, the wiki may be outdated though. Anyone
have any thoughts on this?

	Matt
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Schulte 
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 8:12 AM
To: C F; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Operator Panels?


The problem we're having is transfers don't seem to work? ie: when
someone calls inbound, you drag and drop the call on the extension you'd
like and it just bridges the 2 phones together instead of transfering
the call? Maybe this was intentional or maybe I'm just doing something
wrong? Other than that the panel seems to work great.

	Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: C F [mailto:shmaltz at gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 8:56 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Operator Panels?


What was wrong with Asternic, I use it and it works fine.


On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:07:11 -0600, Matt Schulte <mschulte at netlogic.net>
wrote:
> Ok, we're trying to use Asterisk as a PBX in our office. Our original
> plan was to use a Cisco 7960 with a 7914 attached. Short story is, no 
> one updated chan_sccp in a long time and the 7914 is questionable at 
> best anyway from what I've heard. We couldn't ever get chan_sccp to 
> compile, I went to an older version of Asterisk and that broke some of

> our SIP devices. We tried using a couple soft panels listed on the
> Wiki, the only one easy enough to use was Asternic. And we found also 
> that is buggy and doesn't function correctly with the new Asterisk. 
> Any Suggestions?
> 
> I was looking at the SNOM 220 (w/ op panel). We're mainly after the
> line status of course more than anything, wasn't sure if it could do 
> that, SIP and all..
> 
>         Matt
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users