[Asterisk-Users] Broadvoice Patch Error {Scanned}
Paul
digium-list at 9ux.com
Tue Jan 18 19:40:36 MST 2005
It seems highly likely that it would be in cvs by now. I would not use
the file produced by this patch run without first finding out why hunk
#12 succeeded. One possible cause would be that the original hunk has
been reversed in cvs for some good reason. Note that I usually use this
safe and sane test when working with modified sources from debian or
another distro. Sometimes the package maintainers apply some patches to
the upstream source but they don't always clearly document that. Anyway,
I used this method to patch and build * for debian. It was not the cvs
version but it did the job(see if broadvoice will work). I will probably
create a debian package set from cvs next but I need to have a 1.03
machine running alongside the cvs machine in order to file truly
meaningful bug reports :)
Dalon Westergreen wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>http://edvina.net/broadvoice/patch.shtml
>
>this site claims that the patch was incorporated into the * cvs tree
>as of 12/12/2004
>
>--dalon
>
>On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:15:01 -0800, David Shaw <asterisk at ke6upi.com> wrote:
>
>
>>I ran a test patch like Paul said.
>>
>>[root at redhat test]# patch chan_sip.c broadvoicesip2.txt
>>patching file chan_sip.c
>>Hunk #1 FAILED at 231.
>>Hunk #2 FAILED at 323.
>>Hunk #3 FAILED at 494.
>>Hunk #4 FAILED at 502.
>>Hunk #5 FAILED at 3738.
>>Hunk #6 FAILED at 4049.
>>Hunk #7 FAILED at 4071.
>>Hunk #8 FAILED at 4091.
>>Hunk #9 FAILED at 4123.
>>Hunk #10 FAILED at 4165.
>>Hunk #11 FAILED at 4181.
>>Hunk #12 succeeded at 4309 (offset 105 lines).
>>Hunk #13 FAILED at 4320.
>>Hunk #14 FAILED at 4335.
>>Hunk #15 FAILED at 4450.
>>Hunk #16 FAILED at 6402.
>>Hunk #17 FAILED at 6526.
>>Hunk #18 FAILED at 6939.
>>Hunk #19 FAILED at 6974.
>>18 out of 19 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file chan_sip.c.rej
>>[root at redhat test]#
>>
>>I'm guessing I have a patched verison of Asterisk?
>>I tested this on a fresh CVS install.
>>
>>Thanks, David
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Paul" <digium-list at 9ux.com>
>>To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
>><asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
>>Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 10:31 AM
>>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Broadvoice Patch Error {Scanned}
>>
>>
>>
>>>There is a sane and safe way to do this when you are not sure if the
>>>patches are already in:
>>>
>>>1 - create a new "scratch" directory
>>>
>>>2 - copy the patch and chan_sip.c to that directory
>>>
>>>3 - patch chan_sip.c broadvoicesip2.txt
>>>
>>>If you have the right(unpatched) version of the c source you will only
>>>get messages about hunks suceeding.
>>>
>>>ls -al should now yield something like this:
>>>
>>>drwxr-xr-x 2 sysadmin sysadmin 4096 2005-01-13 00:42 .
>>>drwxr-xr-x 16 sysadmin sysadmin 4096 2005-01-17 23:38 ..
>>>-rw-r--r-- 1 sysadmin sysadmin 15116 2004-12-12 06:02
>>>
>>>
>>broadvoicesip2.txt
>>
>>
>>>-rw-r--r-- 1 sysadmin sysadmin 291894 2005-01-13 00:42 chan_sip.c
>>>-rw-r--r-- 1 sysadmin sysadmin 287963 2004-10-25 13:57 chan_sip.c.orig
>>>
>>>David Shaw wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hello, I'm trying to patch Asterisk for uses wth BroadVoice. I'm
>>>>running Asterisk at Home <mailto:Asterisk at Home>.
>>>>
>>>>Here is the Error:
>>>>[root at pbx1 asterisk]# patch < broadvoicesip2.txt
>>>>can't find file to patch at input line 8
>>>>Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option?
>>>>The text leading up to this was:
>>>>--------------------------
>>>>|Index: channels/chan_sip.c
>>>>|===================================================================
>>>>|RCS file: /usr/cvsroot/asterisk/channels/chan_sip.c,v
>>>>|retrieving revision 1.510.2.23
>>>>|diff -u -r1.510.2.23 chan_sip.c
>>>>|--- channels/chan_sip.c 26 Nov 2004 01:54:11 -0000
>>>>
>>>>
>>1.510.2.23
>>
>>
>>>>|+++ channels/chan_sip.c 12 Dec 2004 10:57:45 -0000
>>>>--------------------------
>>>>File to patch:
>>>>[root at pbx1 asterisk]#
>>>>
>>>>What file should I patch???
>>>>
>>>>Thanks, David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>>dangerous content by *KE6UPI* <http://ke6upi.com/>, and is
>>>>believed to be clean.
>>>>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers <http://www.transtec.co.uk/> for
>>>>their support.
>>>>Plase contact Support at KE6UPI <mailto=support at ke6upi.com> if you
>>>>have questions about this email.
>>>>
>>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>>>>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>>>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>>>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>>>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>>
>>>--
>>>This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>dangerous content by KE6UPI, and is
>>>believed to be clean.
>>>KE6UPI thanks MailScanner for their support.
>>>Please contact support at ke6upi.com if you have
>>>questions about this email.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>--
>>This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>dangerous content by KE6UPI, and is
>>believed to be clean.
>>KE6UPI thanks MailScanner for their support.
>>Please contact support at ke6upi.com if you have
>>questions about this email.
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>
>>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list