[Asterisk-Users] On Hold music
Computer Onsite Support
computeronsitesupport at comcast.net
Mon Jan 17 21:08:24 MST 2005
You right the sound card is NOT necessary like you just said. I mean when I
dial extension 216 I should be able to hear the on-hold music but is not
working on a new machine I want to put in production but it works on a PIII
500Mh that I want to retire.
-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of Jerry
Rasmussen
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 11:04 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] On Hold music
This may sound kind of crazy and I maybe missing something. But are you
placing the call on hold so you can hear the hold music. This may not
be the case but you may have to place the call on hold to here the
music.
Also you mentioned sound, you do not need a sound card in the asterisk
box to use this hold music feature.
Hope this helps.
-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Computer
Onsite Support
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 10:51 PM
To: matt.riddell at sineapps.com; Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] On Hold music
Please be more specific regarding symbolic link of mpg321 so I can
troubleshoot it myself. The strength thing is that I tried this in three
other different computers and can't get it to work using same
installation guide was able to get it to run on a PIII 500 which I want
to get rid of it now.
-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of Matt
Riddell
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 10:09 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] On Hold music
Computer Onsite Support wrote:
> Thanks you but that didn't work. Any other solutions?
Make sure you are using the correct version of mpg123...
I think from memory the correct version is 0.59r
Also, I think Redhat has simply made a symlink to mpg321 (which is *not*
the same).
--
Cheers,
Matt Riddell
_______________________________________________
http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list