[Asterisk-Users] New 'n' priority

[Bill Seddon]

Thanks for your replies.  I'd read somewhere that the n priority was "after
1.0" but I now understand that this means "after 1.0 and subsequent stable
patches".  Thanks again and I shall download HEAD.

Bill Seddon

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Adam Fineberg
Sent: January 08, 2005 2:38 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] New 'n' priority

Christopher L. Wade wrote:

> Bill Seddon wrote:
>
>> Can anyone point me to documentation covering the new 'n' priority.  
>> I've
>> downloaded and have working v1-0-2.  But when I attempt to use the n
>> priority - for example:
>>
>> exten => s,1(checkavail),ChanIsAvail(${EMERGENCY_TRUNK}) exten => 
>> s,n(dial),Dial(SIP/1001)
>>
>> Asterisk generates errors containing the text "pbx_load_module: Invalid
>> priority".
>>
>> Can anyone help or show me what I'm doing wrong?
>>
>> Bill Seddon
>
>
> 'n' and 's' as well as labels only work in CVS HEAD, its not in any of 
> the 'stable' versions.
>
> -Chris
>
Well I'm using v1.0.3 and previously v1.0.2 and they certainly know 
about 's'.  Haven't tried 'n' yet.

Adam
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users