[Asterisk-Users] List tips for new subscribers <--sorry for 2
nd post, missed this.
Steve Blair
blairs at isc.upenn.edu
Wed Feb 23 14:13:17 MST 2005
Colin Anderson wrote:
>>The CTO is highly unlikely to know or care about the low level technology
>>decisions. It isn't something that bubbles up to his level or pay
>>grade.
>>
>>
>
>Unless it's presented to him as a means of doing something faster, better,
>more cheaply, better interop etc. Isn't that the value proposition in
>Asterisk? Maybe not to the CTO, but the CTO's underling, the second level
>manager. Presumably, this guy would have the CTO's ear.
>
>I read an article about CN Rail in Canada which is kind of like Amtrack in
>the US. They had Linux trickle in as replacements for DNS servers running
>Solaris, I think. Something they paid big bucks for. It was goofy, because
>BIND is BIND, right? The biggest resistance was convincing the suits that
>this Linux thing wasn't a scam and offered the same featureset and
>reliability that Solaris did. Eventually what happened is that the suits
>looked around and found out that BIND-Linux was the preferred means of DNS
>for the Net, and all of a sudden it was legitimized for them. They started
>out with DNS, and eventually they migrated wholesale to Linux.
>
>
>
Hee Hee Hee. The " I read about Linux in Golf Digest syndrom" :-)
>I see the same thing in the Asterisk context. Mark builds a killer platform.
>The geeks go into convulsions of ectasy. They evangelize. The userbase
>builds. Slashdot lusers pester you with questions. You answer, they figure
>out sip.conf, and then they evangelize. More lusers come along and pester.
>You answer, with the patience of Job, then they evengelize. Eventually, a
>mainstream effect comes into play, and the platform starts to get mainstream
>acceptance. Hopefully, CTO of XYZ sees an article in the Wall Street Journal
>(more legitimate than Wired? Depends.) about this thing, and calls up his
>batman and says "Find out about this thing" and then at that point Mark can
>finally afford his hot tub. (whatever happened to that anyway?)
>
>
>
It's the same old problem. Technical people rarely speak
Business-eeezzz. As a result technology has to
hit main stream before someone can wrap the business language around it
so decision makers understand
the value.
>Sorry about the math. Duh.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list