[Asterisk-Users] Zaptel DACS and FDL
Eric Wieling
eric at fnords.org
Thu Feb 17 09:53:42 MST 2005
Jerry wrote:
>
> On Feb 16, 2005, at 7:19 PM, Eric Wieling wrote:
>
>> Jerry wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 16, 2005, at 3:07 PM, Eric Wieling wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have the following configuration:
>>>>
>>>> CLEC -> T-1 -> Asterisk -> Adtran Channel Bank -> (analog) -> Nortel
>>>>
>>>> Don't complain that it's ugly. I've already done plenty of that.
>>>>
>>>> The CLEC manages their Adtran remotely and needs to be able to
>>>> continue to do so. I assume they use FDL to do the management. We
>>>> are using the Zaptel DACS/DACSRBS to cross connect some of the
>>>> channels directly between the CLEC and the Adtran. These are
>>>> channels we don't really care about (data, other voice, etc). We
>>>> are not cross connecting all the channels, just some of them.
>>>>
>>>> I'm wondering if/how I can make sure the remote management via FDL
>>>> continues to work. Does anyone have any information on this or
>>>> suggestions or anything?
>>>
>>> What you dropped from your diagram is the T1 from * to the channel
>>> bank. FDL is a link level protocol. It is carried in the framing bits
>>> of the T1 not within the payload bits. When you use the digium (I
>>> presume) card within your * server as a DACS this is connecting the
>>> payload, ie timeslot, bits from one port to another. FDL will not
>>> work this way.
>>
>>
>> DACSRBS does DACS the robbed bit signalling. I assume this won't
>> help? Ah well. We'll try to find some other way to do
>
>
> Robbed bit refers to robbing a bit from the payload - hence the name -
> and the reason you can only get a 56k channel on links utilizing this
> form of signalling - vs 64k when not.
Yes, but does FDL run over the per channel robbed bit signalling or
does it run over the T-1 signaling. i.e. Does FDL run using ESF
(applies to the whole T-1) or does it run on the robbed bit signaling
for specific channels?
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list