[Asterisk-Users] ATA's

[Shaun Ewing]

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 07:08:08 +0800, Leo Ann Boon <leo at innovax.com.sg> wrote:
> See my comments in line

> From my experience, the ATA is a very solid, dependable piece of
> hardware. I was told by a source in the company that OEMs for Cisco, the
> units are expensive because of the high quality parts being used. The
> web config looks crappy but otherwise where else do you find a $100
> device that does SCCP/MGCP/SIP/H323? None of the competitors even come
> close to that level of protocol support. For developers who have to work
> on various protocols, the ATA is really cool.

I agree.

I'm using the ATA 186 and think it's great. The latest firmware also
changes the web interface - it's similar to the 7905G/7912G phones
now.

I've also tried the Sipura SPA-2000, but had some problems with it, so
the Cisco ATA is my ATA of choice now.

-Shaun