[Asterisk-Users] Snom 190's vs Softphone

[dabigshiznizzle]

Additionally when I do receive the unreachable message as soon as I 
place an outbound call the peer becomes reachable......



dabigshiznizzle wrote:

>    I have been playing with asterisk for a couple of weeks now and I 
> have been very happy with its performance.  However, I have run into a 
> problem with how I want to deploy this solution.
>
> I have a mix of softphones (SJ and Xlite), ATA's, and a couple of IP 
> phones (Snom 190).  The asterisk box is on the public network.  For my 
> primary users they will reside behind a watchguard 4500 firewall.  For 
> the others there will be a mix of Ethernet routers 
> (Linksys/Netgear/DLink).  I have been testing the different 
> deployments and have found that the softphones and ATA's work like a 
> champ in getting around the firewall  and the NAT of the work at home 
> users.  However the Snom phones don't perform as well.
>
> I have played with qualify statement in sip.conf and at first I 
> thought that I might have been OK with not using that argument, but it 
> didn't work.  I continue to get the following:
>
> *CLI> Feb 13 15:50:59 NOTICE[14043]: chan_sip.c:7971 
> sip_poke_noanswer: Peer '9093' is now UNREACHABLE!
>
> When this happens, I can't receive any calls (of course) but I can 
> place outbound calls.  Is this normal?
>
> Can anyone help me with this?
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>