[Asterisk-Users] Is there a Caller ID issue in the latest CVSStable

[Mark Eissler]

I'm confused about the part that you can check out a stable version 
after 1.0.5.

IMHO if you check out what is tagged as 1.0.5 at any time then you 
should get exactly what is in the 1.0.5 tarball. If you check out head 
then you should get all of the latest stuff in CVS which may or may not 
build cleanly (and may segfault or whatever). If you could check out 
1.0.6-rc1 (release candidate 1) or something like that you would get 
everything after 1.0.5 that may or may not build properly but is no 
longer a moving target (features have been frozen).

It just doesn't make sense to me that there would be a 1.0.5 that has 
changed since 1.0.5 was released unless you tag it 1.0.5.1 (or 
something). I mean, why even bother trying to constantly maintain a new 
stable version without having a formal release? 1.0.5 is what it is 
with whatever bugs it came with upon release.

Obviously, just my opinion on "How things should work!". ;-)

-mark


On Feb 11, 2005, at 10:06 AM, Chris Wade wrote:

>
> It basically works out that CVS *is always a moving target*, tarballs 
> are the only things that don't change.  Make sense?
>
> -Chris
>
--
Mark Eissler, mark at mixtur.com
Mixtur Interactive, Inc. - at - http://www.mixtur.com