[Asterisk-Users] T.38 bounty

[Steve Underwood]

Do we have a chan_rtp? T.38 is to FAX as RTP is to audio. In fact, the 
latest T.38 spec. now at last does what the original should have done, 
and specifies a T.38 over RTP option.

chan_h323 and chan_sip need to be modified to accomodate T.38.

Regards,
Steve


Matthew Boehm wrote:

>Since t38 is seperate from SIP, you basically need a chan_t38 right?
>
>-Matthew
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk" <roy at karlsbakk.net>
>To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
><asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
>Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 7:45 AM
>Subject: [Asterisk-Users] T.38 bounty
>
>
>  
>
>>hi
>>
>>there are some comments here,
>>http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20T.38%20Bounty,
>>that people that have earlier offered high bounties for T.38 in
>>asterisk. Please add up, so the one that one day manages to add good
>>T.38 support may get something back for it :)
>>
>>roy
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>  
>