[Asterisk-Users] zaptel TDM21B 4-5 second pause

[Eck]

Thanks for the reply, I'll give that a try. Does anyone know why the zaptel drivers insert a 5secs pause before dialing the last digit? there is a digium bug report about this, but they wrote it off as they rekon they need the pause for echo training, sounds fishy to me... anyone know how to disable it please?

-----Original Message-----
From: "Giovanni Miano" <giomiano at gmail.com> 
Sent: 29/12/2005 21:23 
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" 
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] zaptel TDM21B 4-5 second pause 




Try to append # or * to number

Dial(ZAP/g0/0199255xxxx#) or Dial(ZAP/g0/0199255xxxx*)

Cheers,
Giovanni Miano


2005/12/29, Eck <eck at powernet.com>: 
Hi,

Sorry if this is a little off topic as its really more zaptel related, but hopefully someone will have come across this.,

I am noticing a 4-5 second pause when my Digium TDM21B is dialing, just before dialing the last digit. 

This is causing me problems here in the UK as some telco (no prizes for guessing which one) seems to have reduced thier tolerence on DMTF pauses on some switches, so the switch is timing out after ten digits and not getting the eleventh because of the pause. 

The installation is asterisk at home v2.2.

an example prefix this is happining on is: +44(0)199255xxxx.

I have worked around the problem by reducing DTMF_PAUSE in digits.h and recompliing zaptel, but this seems kludgey, does anyone know of a better solution? 

Many thanks for any help.
-Alex.
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list 
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




-- 
Giovanni Miano 


This message has been comprehensively scanned for viruses, please visit http://virus.e2e-filter.com/ for details. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20051229/1b2dc55f/attachment.htm