[Asterisk-Users] Re: Odd DTMF issue over PRI

[Steven]

Well its official, libpri 1.21 will not work with asterisk 1.0.9 even if already using zaptel 1.2.1.

I tried to match up the patch in http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=5266 to the 1.0.9 version of chan_zap.c and it is too different 
for me to make the changes.

I will have to look hard at asterisk 1.2.1.

If I backup my configs and upgrade to libpri 1.2.1 and asterisk 1.2.1, is it just as simple as reinstalling the older versions if it 
isn't working correctly?

-- 
-- 
Steven

May you have the peace and freedom that come from abandoning all hope of having a better past.
---    -      ---  - - -       -    -     -   -   --  - - - --- - ------   - - --- - - -- -  -    - --   -   -    -
"Steven" <asterisk at tescogroup.com> wrote in message news:dnmtiu$1ph$1 at sea.gmane.org...
>I was wrong.
>
> This patch is for channels/chan_zap.c
>
> I have been hesitant to go to 1.2.1 without config testing.
> Should I have any negative issues going from 1.0.9 to 1.0.10? ( I have to see if the changes are in the 1.0.10 version of 
> channels/chan_zap.c)
>
> -- 
> -- 
> Steven
>
> It looks like http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=5266 is the problem here.
> My CDR shows as not answered for the tool free number.
> The local number answers and call forwards.
>
> Questions:
> It says it was committed on 10-04-05.  How do I know which versions that was?
> I am currently running:
> asterisk stable 1.0.9
> zaptel stable 1.2.1
> libpri stable 1.0.9
>
> I was told that zaptel and asterisk versions do not have to match.
> What about libpri?
>
> Can I go to libpri 1.2.1 and stay with asterisk 1.0.9?
> Should I just patch 1.0.9? (I would have to figure out which version the patch was for)
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>