[Asterisk-Users] h323 vs oh323

[Boris Bakchiev]

I like the chan_ooh323.
I like the idea of selfcontained H323 channel that doesn't rely external
libraries, often with specific versions that conflict with something
else.

OOH323 works "right out of box" and since we started using it to
interconnect Asterisk to Samsung OfficeServ 500 we had no problems
whatsoever.

regards

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of
isamar at isamarmaia.org
Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2005 08:11
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] h323 vs oh323


Try chan_oh323 and if it is not ok, try chan_h323
Both work well in different situations/equipments.


Isamar

On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Innocent Evil wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Would you please share  your experience regarding h323 and oh323 in
asterisk.
> I am confused to choose one.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> --
> You don't have any choice, you already made it before you came
here._______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users