[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.0-beta1 tarball re-released
Asterisk Supporter
Asterisk at ratzlaff.org
Wed Aug 31 11:33:30 MST 2005
I am havng the same issue even after "rm -r -f
/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.0-beta1" and tar extract and recompile. (make
clean;make install). This tarball was downloaded Tuesday afternoon.
Asterisk appears to be running normally, except show version "Asterisk
built by root@<FQDN> on a x86_64 running Linux on 2005-08-31 18:20:48
UTC".
OS is 2.6.12-1.1447_FC4smp
Regards.
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 11:57:52 -0500
From: "B. J. Bomar" <bbomar at fngi.net>
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.0-beta1 tarball re-released
To: "'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'"
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Message-ID: <20050831165021.96C231077E1 at ns2.networkiowa.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I could not find a .version file at the top level of the tarball. Below is
what my include/asterisk/version.h file contains.
/*
* version.h
* Automatically generated
*/
#define ASTERISK_VERSION ""
#define ASTERISK_VERSION_NUM 000000
It's not outside of reason to think that I have screwed something up
somewhere.
Thanks for your help, and all you do for asterisk!
B. J.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin P. Fleming [mailto:kpfleming at digium.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 8:46
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.0-beta1 tarball re-released
B. J. Bomar wrote:
> I am also having the same issue from the ftp tarball.
I've tested the tarball on a bunch of different systems and it worked
properly.
Please post the contents of the include/asterisk/version.h file from
your source tree after the build (and check if there is a .version file
in the top of the source tree).
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list