[Asterisk-Users] quad t1 / 1U rack server combos

Cory Andrews Cory at VOIPSupply.com
Tue Aug 16 14:01:55 MST 2005


The foneBRIDGE is not marketed competitively against Digium or Sangoma 
4T1 cards.  It is designed specifically for folks who have redundant 
Asterisk servers, so that you don't have to purchase a Quad T1 PRI card 
for both your primary, and your failovers. 

Cory J Andrews
Partner / Purchasing
+++++++++++++++
VOIPSupply.com - Everything you need for VOIP
454 Sonwil Drive
Buffalo, NY 14225
+++++++++++++++
tf voice - 800-398-VOIP X22
l voice - 716.630.1555 X22
f - 716.630.1548
e - Cory at VOIPSupply.com
AIM - b2Cory



Damon Estep wrote:

>I have to agree, 4xT1 density is too low for $2500. If there is some
>magic sauce inside the box then maybe.
>
>What exactly is it? A 4 BRI card in a mini Linux install? Who maintains
>the SIP-ISDN translations? What about docs and support? What are the
>chances the box is really just an mini * server?
>
> 
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-
>>bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan k. Creasy
>>Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 2:51 PM
>>To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
>>Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] quad t1 / 1U rack server combos
>>
>>I think the foneBRIDGE is too expensive for what it does. IMHO
>>-jonathan
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
>>[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Cory
>>Andrews
>>Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 4:06 PM
>>To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
>>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] quad t1 / 1U rack server combos
>>
>>William - You should take a look at the foneBRIDGE, new product from
>>redFONE.  It has (4) PRI interfaces, and you run our to your primary
>>    
>>
>and
>  
>
>>failover Asterisk servers via Ethernet.  It does not do load
>>    
>>
>balancing.
>  
>
>>but if you have a hardware failure in your primary Asterisk box, you
>>    
>>
>can
>  
>
>>just fail right over to your secondary box.  You don't need any PRI
>>interface cards in your Asterisk host server at all.
>>
>>Cory J Andrews
>>Partner / Purchasing
>>+++++++++++++++
>>VOIPSupply.com - Everything you need for VOIP
>>454 Sonwil Drive
>>Buffalo, NY 14225
>>+++++++++++++++
>>tf voice - 800-398-VOIP X22
>>l voice - 716.630.1555 X22
>>f - 716.630.1548
>>e - Cory at VOIPSupply.com
>>AIM - b2Cory
>>
>>
>>
>>William Boehlke wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>In our opinion, BAD idea to put four T1s on a single box, unless you
>>>have another box that also has 4 T1s.
>>>
>>>When, not if, the board fails, you have to take your box down to
>>>replace it. And as with anything having to do with computers you are
>>>guaranteed a failure at a peak time.
>>>
>>>Better to split the load between two boxes.
>>>
>>>William Boehlke
>>>Signate
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
>
>>>*From:* asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
>>>[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Chad
>>>Osmond
>>>*Sent:* Tuesday, August 16, 2005 12:15 PM
>>>*To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
>>>*Subject:* RE: [Asterisk-Users] quad t1 / 1U rack server combos
>>>
>>>From what I understand (From Sangoma's tech support) and having a
>>>      
>>>
>IBM
>  
>
>>>x306 SCSI system with an A102u I believe that the system will scale
>>>      
>>>
>up
>  
>
>>>to 4xT1's easily.
>>>With a full T1 of traffic coming in and playing music on hold, the
>>>      
>>>
>CPU
>  
>
>>>was at 7% with no transcoding.
>>>
>>>Sangoma cards are supposed to place less draw on the interrupts and
>>>offer some new direct writing to DMA in their A104 cards. You may
>>>      
>>>
>want
>  
>
>>>to give them a call (Scott or Nenad are the two best people to speak
>>>with).
>>>
>>>From Sangoma README.asterisk:
>>>* Voice data is channelized and grouped into  8 byte chunks in
>>>HARDWARE.  Each voice   channel is then DMAed directly into the
>>>ZAPTEL  buffers.  Thus there is ZERO copy from HARDWARE  to ZAPTEL,
>>>resulting in better performance and  scalability.*
>>>
>>>
>>>It sounds to me like that would be once advantage over Digiums
>>>      
>>>
>cards.
>  
>
>>>They also have Hardware PRI functions that are passed directly to
>>>      
>>>
>>libpri.
>>    
>>
>>>http://sangoma.com/linux/README.asterisk
>>>
>>>Hope that helps.
>>>
>>>Chad
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
>
>>>*From:* asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
>>>[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of
>>>      
>>>
>*Damon
>  
>
>>>Estep
>>>*Sent:* August 16, 2005 12:33 PM
>>>*To:* asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
>>>*Subject:* [Asterisk-Users] quad t1 / 1U rack server combos
>>>
>>>It is amazing to me at this point that there is not an official
>>>      
>>>
>Digium
>  
>
>>>list of supported servers (including 1u models!). Clearly the number
>>>      
>>>
>1
>  
>
>>>issue with the Digium PRI cards is the server that they are used in.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>The new cards even go as far as listing server that DO NOT work on
>>>      
>>>
>the
>  
>
>>>Digium site!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>The wiki references are old and do not have any testing parameters.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>C'mon guys! Certify a few current model servers and be done with it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Without that information I must again ask the question;
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>What 1u server combos work with the new quad pri cards UNDER LOAD
>>>(more than 75% channel use). Every user that buys a Digium PRI card
>>>should not have to play hit or miss with 2 or 3 servers that cost
>>>      
>>>
>more
>  
>
>>>than the card to get it to work.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Please Please Please publish something useful to support the sale of
>>>PRI cards.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Damon
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>>>Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.10/73 - Release Date:
>>>      
>>>
>>8/15/2005
>>    
>>
>>>--
>>>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>>>Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.10/73 - Release Date:
>>>      
>>>
>>8/15/2005
>>    
>>
>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>-
>>    
>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>>>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>>  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>_______________________________________________
>>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>    
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
>  
>



More information about the asterisk-users mailing list