[Asterisk-Users] Configuring Asterisk@home for Sipgate.

[Arik Funke]

Hello Brian,

attached are the relevant part of the config files I use. My Setup: I 
use internally only ISDN phones and only use SIPgate to dial out and 
receive calls. I do not use SIP phones. [sipout] demonstrates how to 
dial out on sipgate.

Best regards,
Arik


=== sip.conf ===
[general]
port = 5060
bindport = 5060
bindaddr = 0.0.0.0
qualify=no
disable=all
allow=alaw
allow=alaw
allow=ulaw
allow=g729
allow=gsm
allow=slinear
srvlookup=yes
canreinvite=yes
language=de
register => "sipg. no":"sipg. no"@sipgate.de/"sipg. no"

[sipgate-out]
type=friend
insecure=very ; otherwise I get authentication errors
nat=yes
username="sipg. no"
fromuser="sipg. no"
fromdomain=sipgate.de
secret="sipg. passwd."
host=sipgate.de
qualify=yes
context=sipgate-in


=== extensions.conf ===
[sipgate-in]
exten => "your sipg. no",1,Dial(${INTERN}/29)

[sipout]
exten => _X.,1,SetCallerId,"your sipg. no"
exten => _X.,2,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN}@sipgate-out,30,trg)
exten => _X.,3,Hangup



asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com wrote:
> Send Asterisk-Users mailing list submissions to
> 	asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	asterisk-users-owner at lists.digium.com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Asterisk-Users digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. request for clarification on Asterisk T.38 bounty (Adam Megacz)
>    2. Re: BudgeTone 100 Woes (Tony Mountifield)
>    3. RE: SPA 841 form SIPURA (Paul Dugas)
>    4. Re: z-machine + asterisk = fun! (Lists)
>    5. Unable to connect to FWD (Balaji NJL)
>    6. NT1 devices with analog ports on HFC based ISDN	BRI cards in
>       NT mode and asterisk (chan_mISDN) (Nenad Radosavljevic)
>    7. Re: BudgeTone 100 Woes (Jim Duda)
>    8. VoicePulse Connect down Sunday evening? (Trent Tuggle)
>    9. Re: VoicePulse DTMF Problems Anyone? (Mark Edwards)
>   10. http://www.voip-info.org/ front page taken out by	spammer
>       (Paul Belanger)
>   11. Re: Re: BudgeTone 100 Woes (Doug Lytle)
>   12. Re: request for clarification on Asterisk T.38 bounty
>       (Steve Underwood)
>   13. Re: request for clarification on Asterisk T.38 bounty
>       (Kevin P. Fleming)
>   14. Re: Does anyone run Asterisk on FC4? with Digium's	TDM40B
>       cards (Kumara Jayaweera)
>   15. RE: list of T.38 providers on wiki: please contribute
>       (Dean Collins)
>   16. Re: Unable to connect to FWD (Balaji NJL)
>   17. Re: Unable to connect to FWD (Tony Hoyle)
>   18. Re: function declaration isn't a prototype (chris)
>   19. Re: function declaration isn't a prototype (Dave Cotton)
>   20. Re: Configuring Asterisk at home for Sipgate. (Brian McCarey)
>   21. mysql sock location (Wei Kun)
>   22. Re: BudgeTone 100 Woes (Tony Mountifield)
>   23. ISDN BRI Funkyness (gw at adcomcorp.com)
>   24. How to config voicemail with mysql? (Wei Kun)
>   25. X100P with Caller-ID in Australia, anyone? (Jon Whitear)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:34:45 -0700
> From: Adam Megacz <adam at megacz.com>
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] request for clarification on Asterisk T.38
> 	bounty
> To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> Message-ID: <x164uh8m8a.fsf at nowhere.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> 
> The bounty stands at $5,500.  I'm seriously considering taking a shot
> at it if I can find a decent T.38 provider to test with (I'm still
> hoping for reliable PAYG T.38).
> 
> It looks like a lot of very smart people have done a lot of very hard
> work (t38modem, spandsp) that would go towards getting this working.
> At this point it appears to be mostly a matter of integration
> (libspandsp+asterisk), encapsulating T.38 inside IAX2 (not too hard),
> and testing (tedious and time-consuming).  Basically the easier but
> less-fun part of the "big-picture" task.
> 
> My main question is this: how is the bounty divided?  Does the person
> who does this "grunt work" get the whole $5,500, or does part of it go
> to the authors of t38modem/spandsp (which would surely be a large part
> of any solution)?
> 
> I guess on one hand it would be unjust *not* to divide the bounty with
> them, but on the other hand, if the bounty is to be divided, I think
> the uncertainty about exactly how that would happen might be a factor
> in why the bounty has gone unclaimed for so long.
> 
>   - a
>