[Asterisk-Users] asterisk rpms (was: Does anyone run Asterisk on FC4? with Digium's TDM40B cards)

[Axel Thimm]

Hi,

On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 09:05:51AM -0400, Zachary Whitley wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 16:14 +0600, Madhawa Jayanath wrote:
> > Kumara Jayaweera wrote:
> > >Does anyone run Asterisk on FC4? with Digium's TDM40B cards. any
> > >success stories? my Intel 865 M'd+ Intel 3.0GHz freezee during
> > >installation (FC4).  Please any comments?

> > Yes, Without problems.  Can u install RH9 on ur box?
> 
> I'm assuming that Madhawa is suggesting that you install RH9. I've
> installed Asterisk on FC4 with very few problems. Start with a
> standard FC4 installation then install the following rpms from
> atrpms.net:
> 
> asterisk-addons asterisk-sounds zaptel zaptel-devices

> One little problem. Maybe it's been fixed but last time I checked it
> wasn't. In the /etc/init.d/zaptel the path to ztcfg is
> incorrect. Find all references to ztcfg and change them to =>
> /usr/sbin/ztcfg
> 
> You can copy the sample configs from
> /usr/share/doc/asterisk-1.0.9/configs/ to get you going. Running
> asterisk -c -vvv will let you know which ones you need.
> 
> The rest is going to be specific to your hardware and setup. Good luck. 

Thanks for the comments on the packages.

I'm looking for more feedback and improvements on the asterisk and
friends rpms at ATrpms. Red Hat Linux, Fedora Core and RHEL (and
clones) are supported.

There are already some bug reports at bugzilla.atrpms.net on
enhancements and bugs in the packages, see

http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&long_desc_type=substring&long_desc=asterisk&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailcc2=1&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=

Thanks!
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050807/42c50b3c/attachment.pgp