[Asterisk-Users] "404 User Not Found" when calling between two X-Lites

Abraham WEI abraham.wei at gmail.com
Mon Apr 11 01:24:57 MST 2005


I saw in the dump captured by Ethereal that X-Lite received "200(OK)" from 
asterisk after sending "INVITE". So I guessed X-Lite registered well. But I 
got null reply when I ran "sip show peer" in asterisk console.
What is your opinion about that?

On Apr 8, 2005 8:43 PM, Rich Adamson <radamson at routers.com> wrote:
> 
> > The configuration for X-Lite in sip.conf:
> > [177209]
> > ;Turn off silence suppression in X-Lite ("Transmit Silence"=YES)!
> > ;Note that Xlite sends NAT keep-alive packets, so qualify=yes is not 
> needed
> > type=friend
> > ;regexten=1234 ; When they register, create extension 1234
> > ;username=xlite1
> > ;callerid="Jane Smith" <5678>
> > host=dynamic
> > ;nat=yes ; X-Lite is behind a NAT router
> > ;canreinvite=no ; Typically set to NO if behind NAT
> > disallow=all
> > ;allow=gsm ; GSM consumes far less bandwidth than ulaw
> > allow=ulaw
> > ;allow=alaw
> >
> > [177210]
> > ;Turn off silence suppression in X-Lite ("Transmit Silence"=YES)!
> > ;Note that Xlite sends NAT keep-alive packets, so qualify=yes is not 
> needed
> > type=friend
> > ;regexten=1234 ; When they register, create extension 1234
> > ;username=xlite1
> > ;callerid="Jane Smith" <5678>
> > host=dynamic
> > ;nat=yes ; X-Lite is behind a NAT router
> > ;canreinvite=no ; Typically set to NO if behind NAT
> > disallow=all
> > ;allow=gsm ; GSM consumes far less bandwidth than ulaw
> > allow=ulaw
> > ;allow=alaw
> >
> > The 2 X-Lites registered well with username 177209 and 177210
> > respectively. When I made a call between them, I got "404
> > User Not Found" message from asterisk.
> > Any idea?
> >
> > X-Lites both run on Microsoft Windows XP Professional.
> > asterisk 1.07 runs on Red Hat Linux 7.3.
> 
> Need to look at "sip show peers" to see if they are actually registered.
> My first guess they are not since you likely need
> username=
> secret=
> parameters in both of the above examples.
> 
> If they are in fact registered, then what "context" are both of these
> extensions registered in, and what does that context look like in
> extensions.conf?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050411/4cc9498f/attachment.htm


More information about the asterisk-users mailing list