[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Google Group?

[Damon Estep]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-
> bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Damon Estep
> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 3:15 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Google Group?
> 
> >
> > On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 12:01 -0600, Damon Estep wrote:
> > > > >> Why? I'd say it's only a config issue. As long as the google
> group
> > > > >> has this mailing list as it's only feed and posting to the
> group
> > > > >> is equivalent to posting to the list everything should be
fine.
> > > > >>
> > > > > How do you propose getting posts from google to here? Email?
> > > >
> > > > Well, the group receives it's content by email. It's nothing
else
> > > > than a subscribed user. As that, it could post (email) to this
> list
> > > > as well.
> > > >
> > > > Regards, Bruno.
> > > >
> > > And that is where the problems starts, if the group posts via
email,
> and
> > > is subscribed via email, you form a loop
> > >
> >
> > *ONLY* if you redirect everything google receives via email back to
> the
> > list.  They do not have to do that they could forward only what is
> > posted via their webpage to the list, but choose not to do
(aparently)
> > which causes a seperate list populated in part by the existing list.
> It
> > creates a one way information flow to google groups but not from it.
> >
> > --
> > Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com
> 
> Do we know who set the group up? Is that an option?
> _______________________________________________


It would be q heck of a lot more readable! Too bad they didn't get it
right, and why use a name like asterisk-test, you would think they would
have the brains to call it asterisk-users...