[Asterisk-Users] Re: TE405P vs TE410P

Andrew Kohlsmith akohlsmith-asterisk at benshaw.com
Thu Apr 7 14:02:43 MST 2005


On April 7, 2005 04:42 pm, Tony Mountifield wrote:
> OK, I'd been told this chip could support both 3.3V and 5V, but from what
> you're saying, it sounds like it can be set up to support 3.3V OR 5V, but
> not both at once.... officially. Of course, when selling product it is
> prudent only to work within the official specs!

That is correct; the chip is both 5V and 3.3V capable but the 5V logic blocks 
are *not* certified by Xilinx to work in 3.3V systems.  I manually looked at 
the Voh/Vol, Vih/Vil and current specs on the I/O blocks and they seemed fine 
to me, so I went ahead and did it.

So really, Digium could dual-key the TE405P and take the chance, but I know I 
certainly wouldn't do it from a business perspective.

> Does anyone know if the new TE411P is compatible with both kinds of slot?
> I see the Sangoma A104 has both cutouts on the edge connector.

You'd have to see the card edge.  I couldn't find a picture of it on the web 
site.

> No way :-). It was only brought up today because all I have is a TE405P
> and when I went to try it in a new system the slot was the wrong type. If
> I really need to put a PRI card in that system, I'll buy a TE410P. Or a
> Sangoma (but they are considerably more expensive in the UK).

That's exactly what happened to me.  I got the TE405P since *all* systems have 
5V slots but only a few have 3.3V ones.  Then my SuperMicro server came and 
all it had were 3.3V slots.  dammit!  :-)

-A.



More information about the asterisk-users mailing list