[Asterisk-Users] DUNDi in stable? (New subject)

[Deon Rodden]

When do you think the last stable CVS will be available before "lots of
stuff" begins to change? I want to find the best possible Asterisk and stick
with it, for some time, maybe until 2.0; If I get CVS right now, what if
tomorrow or the day after he comes out with a better CVS. 

I wonder if Mark can rename the last stable CVS to 1.1 and then start adding
new features and such.

You think today or tomorrow I should pull the CVS and don't touch it for a
while? Except on Dev machines and such? Lately I've been treating the CVS
Head as stable, just bug fixes with every new release.

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Brian West
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 5:10 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi in stable? (New subject)

I totally agree... if you want DUNDi get cvs-head NOW and I mean NOW.. next
week lots of stuff starts to change and it will NOT be something you will
wanna run in production.

bkw

> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-
> bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Olle E. Johansson
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 3:42 PM
> To: ryan at voxbox.ca; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
> Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi in stable? (New subject)
> 
> Ryan Courtnage wrote:
> 
> >>http://www.dundi.com
> >>
> >>Yet, another great idea!!  Thanks Mark!!
> >>
> >>I wish it was in v1.0, but I guess I'll have to update to head.
> >
> >
> > I wish it were in v1.0 as well. Would creating a patch for 1.0 be pretty
> > simple, or do the code changes run deep?
> It will eventuall get into a release.
> 
> But please, as a community, we have to refrain from temptation of adding
> new functions to the stable tree. It has to be kept stable - and that is
> boring. If you want to walk on the wild side, run CVS head.
> 
> CVS head is the development tree. Please don't encourage people to use it
> in production environments, even if it from time to time seems to work
> well.
> We need to be able to include new untested functions. Some days, it
> doesn't
> compile properly after you download it to your system. That is okey, it
> means
> that we have new code, new functions and new bugs to fix.
> 
> We need a development CVS as fertile soil for new major Asterisk
> breakthroughs.
> I've been waiting long for that to happen, and if you check the -cvs list,
> you'll find that there's been a lot of changes to the development branch
> that would never have happened if we didn't have a less strict environment
> to play around with. Keeps the bug tracker alive :-)
> 
> /Olle
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users