[Asterisk-Users] Alternatives to the T100Ps?

[Brian Kurkowski]

Michael, 

I usually read and don't do much posting, but I had to on this. 

I am really suprised to see your commnets, and wondered what is the basis ?
We have had a dual Xenon with a quad port T1 card in production for 16
months processing as many as 20,000 messaging calls a day. The box has never
crashed, the board has never crashed, we haven't even restarted asterisk
much less upgraded the code. I have never take a Bit Error on my DMS-500
from a Digium card. This is only one of several "production boxes" but the
story is the same on all of them.

How in the heck does this equate to:  "hardware, drivers, or both is pretty
sketchy" ?

I would suggest just the opposite. Mark and the boys have done a great job
on all fronts. How many Cisco AS-5300's have that record ? I have 9 of them
brand new and not a single one is my answer.

If you haven't looked at Digium lately, look again.





-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Loftis [mailto:mloftis at wgops.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 2:17 PM
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Alternatives to the T100Ps?


Since I'm pretty sure that either the hardware, drivers, or both is pretty 
sketchy I'm interested in hearing alternatives, non-digium, and non-zaptel 
kernel modules, for ISDN PRI with *.

--
GPG/PGP --> 0xE736BD7E 5144 6A2D 977A 6651 DFBE 1462 E351 88B9 E736 BD7E 
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users