[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk/linux 2.6.9 kernel build failure
Bob Goddard
asterisk at bgcomp.co.uk
Sun Nov 28 12:43:26 MST 2004
On Sunday 28 November 2004 19:25, Steven P. Donegan wrote:
> Peter Svensson wrote:
> >On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Brian West wrote:
> >>I don't agree with this patch yet... It's the distro's fault for doing
> >> this wrong and I don't feel we have to work around it. The few people I
> >> talked to have Symlinks the "build" to /usr/src/linux or the like. Then
> >> again I may be wrong anyone know what is the right(tm) thing to do here
> >> is?
> >
> >Havn't 2.6 adopted the /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/ convention or
> >something similar?
> >
> >Not having any 2.6-based machines online at the moment I can not check.
> >This is from memory compiling out-of-tree modules a while back.
>
> Well - if 2.6.etc did adopt this it isn't reflected in actual make/make
> install world - i.e. nothing gets installed in /lib/modules/anywhere...
> And this is with kernel source from kernel.org - not a distro-tweaked
> source tree
2.6 did adopt it. Look at the target _modinst_: in the Linux top level
Makefile.
B
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list