[Asterisk-Users] Re: Sipura and STUN (was: rejected NOTIFY re quests)

[Darren Nay]

Sipura does include STUN as an option.  It has for quite some time.  We are
using it with all of our Sipuras behind NAT'd gateways and it works great!

Try upgrading to the latest Sipura firmware rev.

Darren Nay

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Todd [mailto:jtodd at loligo.com]
> Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 1:57 PM
> To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Sipura and STUN (was: rejected NOTIFY
> requests)
> 
> At 7:36 PM +0200 on 5/22/04, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
> >>[snip]
> >Sending NOTIFY to Asterisk is an error, but a workaround. Since Asterisk
> >can handled the NAT traversal all by itself with Qualify (as John points
> >out) disabling the NOTIFY will not change anything.
> >
> >The NOTIFY will in no way affect the status - unreachable/reachable.
> >
> >Another problem with the SIPURA is the lack of a working STUN solution.
> >Even Grandstream works better with NAT today.
> >/O
> 
> Do you have difficulties with the Sipura SPA-2000 (or other Sipura
> boxes) and Asterisk?  I've found no problems, even behind NAT, though
> I have only tried behind one or two NAT devices (OpenBSD and Apple
> Airport.)
> 
> It's surprising that Sipura doesn't include STUN as an option - their
> list of options is so huge that I always assumed I had just missed
> it, but now that I look closer I suppose you're right.  Do Asterisk
> users even really need STUN?  I've never found it to be required
> after the NAT issues were worked out of Asterisk...
> 
> JT
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users