[Asterisk-Users] rejected NOTIFY requests
Olle E. Johansson
oej at edvina.net
Sat May 22 10:36:45 MST 2004
John Todd wrote:
> At 7:18 AM -0700 on 5/22/04, Bruce Komito wrote:
>
>> When I enable NOTIFY messages in my SIP device (Sipura), Asterisk
>> reports:
>>
>> handle_request: Unknown SIP command 'NOTIFY' from 'xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx'
>>
>> When I disable NOTIFY messages, * reports the device UNREACHABLE,
>> followed
>> by REACHABLE every couple of minutes.
>>
>> I think I want NOTIFY on, because the Sipura is behind a NAT server, but
>> the constant stream of warnings from * make me think I'm doing something
>> wrong. Anyone have any ideas?
>>
>> Thanks in advance!
>>
>> Bruce Komito
>> High Sierra Networks, Inc.
>> www.servers-r-us.com
>> (775) 284-5800 ext 115
>
>
> Try turning NOTIFY off, and adding "qualify=3000" to your SIP stanzas
> for that host.
>
> This will cause Asterisk to originate a SIP OPTIONS query to the device
> every 60 seconds, and if the response takes more than 3000ms (3s) to
> return, then it will list it as "unreachable". Otherwise, it will stay
> listed as 'reachable' and the NAT mappings will stay in place for the
> Sipura device since there will be traffic flowing at a reasonable rate
> between the server and the Sipura.
>
> It's probably the case that the NAT mapping for the firewall/NAT you're
> behind is less than the interval at which the Sipura sends NOTIFY
> requests, though I'm interested as to why it's reported as "unreachable"
> instead of "unknown".
>
Sending NOTIFY to Asterisk is an error, but a workaround. Since Asterisk
can handled the NAT traversal all by itself with Qualify (as John points
out) disabling the NOTIFY will not change anything.
The NOTIFY will in no way affect the status - unreachable/reachable.
Another problem with the SIPURA is the lack of a working STUN solution.
Even Grandstream works better with NAT today.
/O
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list