[Asterisk-Users] Softphone lag
Jason A. Pattie
pattieja at pcxperience.com
Thu May 20 09:28:10 MST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jason Williams wrote:
| This is normal for all VoIP communication there is nothing to wory about
| and the lag is not heard in normal use.
|
| Jason
|
| At 13:50 20/05/2004 +0530, you wrote:
|
|> Hi,
|> IF i use a sip softphone or a iax softphone with asterisk, i get a lag
|> of about 1 second.
|> The two phones were on 2 different pc's near me. When I speak on one,
|> i hear it on the other after about 1 second.
|> I tried using iaxComm, Xten Xlite, etc. Same.
|>
|> FYI: The codec used was GSM.
Would it get better if a "straight" codec were used? I.e., one that
does full 8KBps (I think that's either ALAW or ULAW). In other words,
bandwidth usage would obviously increase over a codec like GSM, but
would the lag be reduced because no translation has to be done at all,
just send it to the audio device, no (de)compression, etc.?
- --
Jason A. Pattie
pattieja at xperienceinc.com
Xperience, Inc. (http://www.xperienceinc.com)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFArNyauYsUrHkpYtARAu3xAJ9Fs0DBy84FrKvNRFVJ33xKk44EmwCfakDp
IJTNikr6bb04fAJyYaiW0Ak=
=HphP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list