[Asterisk-Users] AArgh, * and the 7960
Vic Cross
vicc at veejoe.com.au
Tue May 18 17:43:11 MST 2004
On Tue, 18 May 2004, brian k. west wrote:
> Lets look at this and FIX the problem instead of hacking it. What you need
> to do is install etherreal and capture a call and parse the timestamp info
> to see if they are slipping. Because they are perfect here.
>
> bkw
I'd love to fix the problem, but no-one is listening!
I did what you said, captured Ethereal traces, found that timestamps do
not increment, found BLATANT errors in rtp.c where a signed int is being
used to hold return values from an unsigned int function... and had my
bug report thrown out because I am only able to reproduce the problem with
chan_capi.
Now I know that chan_capi doesn't belong to Digium, and I know that you're
all trying to get a 1.0 release out. But this problem is really hurting
my business, and right now destroying any chance that I might start
offering Asterisk as part of commercial solutions.
Now, kapejod is not replying to my e-mails, and markster's suggestion
(from another bug report) of zeroing out the delivery field in chan_capi's
read function did not work. So hacking is all I have left if I want to
keep using Asterisk -- which I do, because I think it's a great program
with a pretty good community around it.
Vic Cross
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list