[Asterisk-Users] Low Bit Rate Codecs
Steve Underwood
steveu at coppice.org
Mon May 10 05:53:42 MST 2004
brian k. west wrote:
>>>nasty. The higher rate (6.something kbps) sounds more reasonable. Using
>>>30ms blocks, it is not so compatible with *, which is geared to 20ms
>>>block processing. A lost packet causes a 30ms hole, so it tends to be
>>>less tolerant of packet loss than something working in smaller blocks.
>>>It sounds awful for anything but a single pure voice.
>>>
>>>
>
>* can do 30ms codecs. iLBC is one such codec...
>
>
Sure it works. I didn't say it was incompatible. I said it was not so
compatible. Because it doesn't fit into *'s 20ms block view of the world
you end up with greater latency than you would with some other codecs.
Regards,
Steve
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list