[Asterisk-Users] g.729 - licenses and opinions

[Ernest W. Lessenger]

Which is to say that there are no licenses required for G711. It is the
standard, zero-compression, nothing at all special about it codec that most
if not all phones and devices support.
 
--Ernest


  _____  

From: asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of brian
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 12:27 PM
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] g.729 - licenses and opinions



No

 

bkw

 

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of AR Tarzi
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 2:08 PM
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] g.729 - licenses and opinions

 

Are there digium licenses for G711 ?

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Steve  <mailto:steveu at coppice.org> Underwood 

To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com 

Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 15:47

Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] g.729 - licenses and opinions

 

Rich Adamson wrote:

>We've got about five licenses and a remote 7960's v6.3 running over
>dsl working just fine. The average user cannot tell the difference
>between 711 and 729. Installation was easy and straight forward, 
>although you'll find comments in the archives that 729 installation
>requires a non-scsi drive on the * box.
>  
>
Your average users must be rather different from global average users, 
then. They must also be close to deaf :-)

The MOS for G.729 are not bad for an 8Kbps codec, but hardly compares to 
G.711

Regards,
Steve

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040505/edb9f92e/attachment.htm