[1-9] as E? (was: [Asterisk-Users] Busy message)
Eric Wieling
eric at fnords.org
Wed Jun 23 07:01:34 MST 2004
I don't think it's documented, but Z specifies 1-9
exten => _ZXXXX,1,NoOp(.call for .${EXTEN})
On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 03:52, Roger Schreiter wrote:
> Keith Waters schrieb:
> ...
> > I configured:
> >
> > exten => _[123456789]XXXX,1,NoOp(.call for .${EXTEN})
>
> I consider a short key for [1-9] at least
> as useful as N for [2-9], maybe even more useful.
>
> For my internal purposes I'm using E for [1-9].
>
> Am I the only one, who is missing something short
> for [1-9]?
>
>
> Roger.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111
"In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows
upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss."
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list