[1-9] as E? (was: [Asterisk-Users] Busy message)

Eric Wieling eric at fnords.org
Wed Jun 23 07:01:34 MST 2004


I don't think it's documented, but Z specifies 1-9

exten => _ZXXXX,1,NoOp(.call for .${EXTEN})

On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 03:52, Roger Schreiter wrote:
> Keith Waters schrieb:
> ...
> > I configured:
> > 
> > exten => _[123456789]XXXX,1,NoOp(.call for .${EXTEN})
> 
> I consider a short key for [1-9] at least
> as useful as N for [2-9], maybe even more useful.
> 
> For my internal purposes I'm using E for [1-9].
> 
> Am I the only one, who is missing something short
> for [1-9]?
> 
> 
> Roger.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
          Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111
"In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows
upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss."




More information about the asterisk-users mailing list