[Asterisk-Users] Busy message
Simon Brown
Simon.Brown at otterson.com.au
Tue Jun 22 18:07:25 MST 2004
Logged in bugtracker as Bug #1893
Simon Brown
-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Rich Adamson
Sent: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 11:37
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Busy message
The issue has been suggested several times. Open a bug tracker entry, let's
track it; I'll support it.
------------------------
> This should be listed as a bug - it is not logical to go to busy, when
> in fact the extension is unavailable.
>
> Simon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Eric
> Wieling
> Sent: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 8:43
> To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Busy message
>
> *I* think it should go to unavailable, but it has always gone to busy.
>
> On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 16:34, Simon Brown wrote:
> > Then shouldn't Asterisk be changed so it jumps to "unavailable" in
> > the dial plan? Surely this would be the "correct" way of working.
> >
> > Simon Brown
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com
> > [mailto:asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Eric
> > Wieling
> > Sent: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 0:47
> > To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Busy message
> >
> > On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 23:26, Simon Brown wrote:
> > > When I dial a SIP phone which is specified in the sip.conf, but
> > > the phone is not connected, Asterisk gives the message "The user
> > > at Extension XXX is on the phone ...."
> > > Shouldn't the message be the unavailable message?
> > > Is there something wrong with my set up or is this a "bug" with
Asterisk?
> >
> > No. It's just the way Asterisk works.
> --
> Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111 "In a
> related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows
> upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
---------------End of Original Message-----------------
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list