[Asterisk-Users] Busy message

[Jay Milk]

If you go by logic, you're actually wrong about this:
Dial is supposed to DIAL an extension.  If an error condition exists, it
goes to Priority+101.  Error conditions are defined as anything that
will prevent the phone from ringing... Such as off-hook (busy), or the
sip device being unreachable.  Dial will continue with the next priority
on time-out (which generally happens when the device isn't answered).

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Brown [mailto:Simon.Brown at otterson.com.au] 
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 6:44 PM
> To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Busy message
> 
> 
> This should be listed as a bug - it is not logical to go to 
> busy, when in fact the extension is unavailable.
> 
> Simon 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of 
> Eric Wieling
> Sent: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 8:43
> To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Busy message
> 
> *I* think it should go to unavailable, but it has always gone to busy.
> 
> On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 16:34, Simon Brown wrote:
> > Then shouldn't Asterisk be changed so it jumps to 
> "unavailable" in the
> > dial plan?  Surely this would be the "correct" way of working.
> > 
> > Simon Brown
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com
> > [mailto:asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Eric
> > Wieling
> > Sent: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 0:47
> > To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Busy message
> > 
> > On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 23:26, Simon Brown wrote:
> > > When I dial a SIP phone which is specified in the 
> sip.conf, but the
> > > phone is not connected, Asterisk gives the message "The user at 
> > > Extension XXX is on the phone ...."
> > > Shouldn't the message be the unavailable message?
> > > Is there something wrong with my set up or is this a 
> "bug" with Asterisk?
> > 
> > No.  It's just the way Asterisk works.
> -- 
>           Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111 
> "In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost 
> of Windows upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss."
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com 
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/aster> isk-users
> To 
> UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users