[Asterisk-Users] Re: Asterisk-Users List Etiquette
Bill Reid
billreid at shaw.ca
Tue Jun 15 13:14:10 MST 2004
For me the big issue of html is in the message digests. Since the html
is mixed in with plain text browsers do not detect the html. For
individual messages HTML is generally not a problem.
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk-Users List Etiquette
> From: Steven Critchfield <critch at basesys.com>
> To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:10:12 -0500
> Reply-To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
>
> On Tue, 2004-06-15 at 08:35, Rich Adamson wrote:
>
>>Isn't it odd as hell the same people that complain about html are also
>>some of the same people that use "special" mail readers to emulate news
>>readers? Both seem to want to influence the 8,000 list members their
>>tools are the only one's in existence and we better all format our
>>list postings to make their tool happy. NOT!
>>
>>Guess my 1996 reader must be a little odd; it handles top & bottom postings
>>along with html without complaining a bit.
>
>
> Most all mail readers these days support HTML email. The difference
> though is when one uses a mail reader that renders the HTML and the HTML
> is written by someone who has no clue how the readers machine is set up.
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list