[Asterisk-Users] Sending # and Asterisk Transfer Conflict

[brian]

That was covered on the bug tracker.. but mark said that’s not a good way to
do it.

bkw
PS: on a site note HTML email SUCKS!

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Karl J.
Vesterling
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 4:03 PM
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Sending # and Asterisk Transfer Conflict


It would be nice to have an option where dialing two #'s would send a single
#.

I too have had difficulty with this.

My workaround is to use my cell when calling an IVR.

ANother workaround I have through of would be to use 99 for outgoing, but
with no transfer options in the Dial() setting.  This of course implies
you're expecting to interact with a remote IVR.

PS:  SIP Transfer only works with SIP phones...  For those of us using
Zapata channels we're pretty much screwed if that's your only option.

At 02:09 PM 6/9/2004, you wrote:

Yet again.. *SMACK* yes it does.

bkw

> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-
> admin at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Rosebush
> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 12:47 PM
> To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sending # and Asterisk Transfer Conflict
>
> Wouldn't work on an ATA device....
>
> brian wrote:
>
> >*SMACK* no you don't.... just use the native sip transfer to park it. :)
> >
> >bkw
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-
> >>admin at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Kohlsmith
> >>Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 8:30 AM
> >>To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> >>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sending # and Asterisk Transfer Conflict
> >>
> >>On Wednesday 09 June 2004 02:03, brian k. west wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>search for app_valetparking and hope its still out there somewhere :)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>How does that fix the problem?  He still needs # to access ValetParking
> >>and
> >>thus loses the use of # for remote IVR apps.
> >>
> >>All ValetParking gets him is a known parking location...  so I suppose
> in
> >>a
> >>way it is a workaround.  :-)
> >>
> >>-A.
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Asterisk-Users mailing list
> >>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> >>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Asterisk-Users mailing list
> >Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Best Regards,
Karl J. Vesterling
E-Mail: kjv at ken-ton.com
Yahoo Messenger: karl_vesterling
ICQ: 1548052
AOL Instant Messenger: n2vqm

Telephone:
Washington DC: (202) 448-3009 Extension 0
Annapolis MD: (240) 524-6706 Extension 0
Seattle WA: (360) 516-1822 Extension 0
Niagara Falls NY: (716) 286-9175 Extension 0
Buffalo NY: (716) 608-1121 Extension 0
United Kingdom: 0870 3403428 Extension 0