SIP simultaneous registry possible workaround (was Re: [Asterisk-Users] New Asterisk bounty: SIP simultaneous registry)

[Scott Laird]

On Jul 13, 2004, at 5:13 AM, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 July 2004 03:07, Sunrise Ltd wrote:
>>> exten => s,1,Dial(SIP/someuser&SIP/someuser&SIP ......
>
>> That's why you would stick the members into a global
>> variable
>
> You global variable is still unwieldy.  All you did was move the 
> problem.

It scales a bit further then DIAL(SIP/...&SIP/...).  If you want to go 
much further, you'll probably want to move towards auto-generating your 
Asterisk configs from a database or simple specification language.  
That'll scale a lot further, and be more reliable in the face of 
editing mistakes.


Scott