[Asterisk-Users] Re: iax or sip
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Mon Jul 5 18:44:29 MST 2004
> There are many reasons to have an Asterisk box in a stream:
>
> 1. Control a call, (maybe you want to do some ACL type filtering,
> maybe you want to keep track of usage, maybe you just to be in
> control...)
hmmm. post setup, which clearly needs to go through all servers
(or pbxen) in path, i don't see a win here. send more clue.
> 2. Provide features (access to PSTN, conference capability, music
> on hold, call parking, agents and queues..... the list goes on
> and on)
that's setup not payload
> 3. Endpoints (User Agents) MAY not be able to send data streams
> to each other directly (firewalls or nats in the middle)
yes indeed. so one, but likely only one, if they're asterisk, pbx
needs to intermediate, not a bunch on a path.
> And depending upon your view of things (your view might be
> different than the view of the IT/communications administrator of
> a large company), using IAX in a geographically distributed use
> scenario might very well be exactly what you want (use over an
> encrypted vpn link, etc.)
yes, it might be. but as you know, i am a big pipe backbone geek,
not an admin of a large distributed company. and i am addict of
simple (non-complex, not the presence protocol:-).
randy
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list