[Asterisk-Users] Heads up v2.03h on snom 200

[Christian Stredicke]

Yea we still found some issues with the line assignment. I think you should
stay with 2.03f or whatever is loaded; I guess we will have a real good
version by the end of the week.

Christian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-
> admin at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of VoiceLynx
> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 3:56 PM
> To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Heads up v2.03h on snom 200
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-
> > admin at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Rich Adamson
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 2:25 PM
> > To: Asterisk-a-users-list; Christian Stredicke
> > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Heads up v2.03h on snom 200
> >
> > Christian,
> >
> > Just a quick heads up warning that something seems to be amiss on
> > the Snom 200 running v2.03h code.
> >
> > The Message Waiting Indicator is blinking (due to a voicemail left
> > in Asterisk) as its suppose to.  Some time later the LED stops
> > blinking (as though no voicemail); then later it starts blinking
> > again.
> >
> > I left a voicemail to x3008 (button 2) this morning at 8:48am, and
> > purposefully have not picked it up. I'm waiting on recurrance right
> > now. I'm also running a sniffer packet trace to validate whether
> > the phone is being told to turn off the LED, or whether something
> > in the phone is doing it by itself.
> >
> > Pure guess: since there are two lines now defined on this phone, I'd
> > bet Asterisk turns the LED on for MWI on x3008, and since no voicemail
> > exists on x3002 (button 1), it turns it off. (Or something like that.)
> >
> > I don't seem to have this issue with the Cisco 7960's on the same
> > asterisk box, so I'm jumping to the conclusion that something is
> > amiss on the Snom 200 code. But we both know what "assume" means.
> >
> > Rich
> >
> >
> 
> Beta 2.03h for the snom 200 has already been removed from the web site.
> 2.03i is available but I'd suggest that Asterisk users stick with 2.03f
> for now. There are known issues with inbound line assignment on 2.03h
> and 2.03i.
> 
> Richard
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users