[Asterisk-Users] SuperValetParkCall Application Unable to Re-ParkCall

[Kevin]

Thanks, for the feedback.  It would be nice if the Valetpark application
didn't have that limitation.  The park to a specific park number is a
nice feature.



-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Zimm [mailto:pbzinc at dejazzd.com] 
Sent: Friday, December 24, 2004 11:40 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SuperValetParkCall Application Unable to
Re-ParkCall

Kevin wrote:

>After retrieving a SuperValetParkCall using the SuperValetUnparkCall
>command, I am unable to re- SuperValetParkCall the call again.  Can
>anyone confirm if this is a bug or my configs may be incorrect.  
>
>Configs:
>
>
>exten =>
>3XXXX,1,SuperValetParkcall(${EXTEN:1}|mylot|500|${EXTEN:1}|1|local)
>exten => _3XXXX,2,Hangup
>exten => _*3XXXX,1,SuperValetUnParkCall(${EXTEN:2}|mylot)
>exten => _*3XXXX,2,Hangup
>  
>
This is not a bug. I experienced the same problem, and took a peek at 
the code.
Apparently app_supervaletparking uses it's own channel bridge function, 
which
is very basic and doesn't process the # transfer command.

I need the ability to transfer a call after a SuperValetUnparkCall so I
went back to using app_valetparking. I wasn't using the "new" features
in
app_supervaletparking, just the park and unpark functions.

Marv Horst

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.6.4 - Release Date: 12/22/2004