[Asterisk-Users] Fw: [digium.com #12961] T100P as bandwidth

[Brian West]

A lot of this has to do with the stupid linux kernel changing HDLC api time
after time after time.. I think at least 4 times thus far.  I think if you
use 2.4.18 kernel you'll be able to get it to work.

bkw

> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-
> bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steven Critchfield
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 1:32 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: [digium.com #12961] T100P as bandwidth
> 
> On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 13:26 -0500, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> > On December 23, 2004 12:58 pm, Steven Critchfield wrote:
> > > Maybe some of the users just aren't up to the task of getting the job
> > > done. My experience thus far has been very good. All the hardware with
> > > the exception of one which was in marginal at best pieces of equipment
> > > has performed perfectly and without fault.
> >
> > The T100P is generally good and the TE405P is solid, IMO.
> >
> > However we're not talking about audio and these cards.  :-)
> 
> I happen to know of at least one person doing mixed audio and data. I
> even have done ISDN dialup via ZapRAS when we had to prove it worked. I
> think it is as stated before, the free 1 hour of support is insufficient
> to help a mildly knowledgeable user through the setup.
> 
> > > I think some users need to have their assumptions and values checked
> to
> > > see how far from reality they are.
> >
> > While I agree, I also must point out
> > - TDM400P - this card seems to be the #1 source of problems.  I believe
> the
> > FXO module issues are solved but the FXS issues are still around.
> Hopefully
> > the same fix works.
> 
> I think this is also a case of unprepared users and a not yet polished
> product. Only those doing small time to hobby deployments use those
> cards. You can't expect them to be as knowledgeable as the people
> deploying on PRIs. I think both aspects compound the trouble.
> 
> > - IAXy - I have no personal experience with this but the list has been
> showing
> > dead modules recently
> 
> Out of the number of multi hundred deployments I have heard about, I
> think the couple you hear here and there are probably statistically
> insignificant overall. Doesn't help the specific users who are getting
> bit, but overall, I don't see enough to think there is an inherent
> problem.
> --
> Steven Critchfield <critch at basesys.com>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users