[Asterisk-Users] How
"expensive"are thedifferent codecs?(Regarding CPU time)
Jim Van Meggelen
jim at vanmeggelen.ca
Fri Dec 17 00:16:17 MST 2004
asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com wrote:
> Jim Van Meggelen schrieb:
>
>> You understand. I was kidding a little bit, but yes, I am also
>> wondering just what things can be done to get a slower machine to
>> work as well as possible.
>
> Okay. So lets try.
What are you running in terms of a kernel or distro?
>>>> Have you tried running Asterisk at pseudo-realtime priority?
>>>> (asterisk -p)
>>>
>>> That helps in one way: At the moment my system is doing its morning
>>> routine. That means it makes a tar archieve of my /home directory to
>>> my backup drive. With the -p option the "show translation"-values
>>> are equal to the values when my system is idle.
>>>
>>
>> And otherwise not?
>
> Otherwise - without the -p option - the system had values of 400ms
> (and higher) converting speex when it wasn't idle. Now the value
> is constantly at about 210.
Nice. The system is now giving Asterisk the priority it needs. Don't
forget to change that in your rc.local, or wherever you're starting
Asterisk from.
>>> I guess this option could help me a lot regarding the sound
>>> problems I got sometimes.
>>
>> Yes, it might help a lot.
>
> I will see when doing some calls over sip (there I had the most
> problems). Maybe at the evening. Now I have to breakfast, shower and
> go to work.
And I need to go to bed!
Cheers,
Jim.
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list